Organisations that haven't yet invested in mentoring are leaving a proven, low-cost lever for engagement and retention on the table. For years, mentoring has been one of the few workplace initiatives that L&D and HR teams can point to with genuinely strong evidence behind it. If you're weighing up whether to start a mentoring program, this guide answers the basics first, then goes further: what mentoring actually is, how digital platforms have changed how it runs, what to look for in mentoring software, and how to get a program off the ground.
TL;DR
Mentoring is a structured relationship where a more experienced person supports someone less experienced to build skills, confidence and career direction. It's distinct from coaching and training. Digital mentoring platforms have replaced spreadsheet-based matching with algorithm-driven pairing, structured check-ins and reporting, making programs easier to run at scale. This guide covers the definition, the main types of mentoring, what to look for in mentoring software, and how to build a business case for a program.
What Is Mentoring and How Do Digital Platforms Facilitate It?
Quick answer: Mentoring is a voluntary, trust-based relationship in which a more experienced person (the mentor) shares knowledge, perspective and networks to help a less experienced person (the mentee) reach professional goals. It's distinct from coaching (which targets a specific skill or performance issue) and training (which delivers standardised content to many people at once). In the workplace, mentoring is typically organised as a formal program with defined goals, a matching process and a set timeframe, or left informal and self-directed.
Digital mentoring platforms facilitate mentoring by replacing manual, spreadsheet-based matching with software that handles three things at scale:
- Matching: algorithms pair mentors and mentees based on goals, skills, seniority and, on platforms like Brancher, personality and values compatibility, rather than an admin manually cross-referencing a spreadsheet.
- Structure: built-in session scheduling, conversation prompts and goal-tracking keep pairs on track without an administrator chasing every relationship individually.
- Measurement: dashboards give program administrators visibility into engagement, matching satisfaction and outcomes across the whole program, rather than relying on anecdotal feedback.
The effect is that a task which used to cap out at a few dozen well-matched pairs before it became unmanageable can now run across an entire organisation, with the admin burden staying roughly flat as participant numbers grow.
What Is Mentoring, Really?
At its core, mentoring is a personal exchange between a mentor and a mentee. It happens between people of any age and in any context, but in the workplace it usually pairs a more experienced employee with someone earlier in their career or role. The mentor shares professional knowledge and helps the mentee work towards goals that also serve the organisation running the program.
Mentoring is neither coaching nor therapy. A mentor helps a mentee identify their own goals and offers perspective drawn from lived experience, rather than diagnosing a problem or prescribing a fix. Because the relationship is built on a genuine interpersonal connection, it tends to be more personal and experiential than other development tools, which is part of why it sticks.
Mentoring vs Coaching vs Training
| Mentoring | Coaching | Training | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Long-term career and professional growth | A specific skill, behaviour or performance goal | Standardised knowledge or compliance content |
| Relationship | Ongoing, personal, built on trust | Structured, often time-boxed | One-to-many, minimal personal relationship |
| Who leads it | Mentee drives the agenda; mentor shares experience | Coach drives structured questioning toward a goal | Trainer or content delivers a fixed curriculum |
| Typical duration | Months, often longer | Weeks to a few months | Hours to days |
| Best suited to | Career development, leadership pipeline, retention | Closing a defined performance gap | Onboarding, compliance, technical upskilling |
Why Do Organisations Need Mentoring?
Mentoring isn't just useful for the individual mentee. When it's run well, it pays back the organisation across several areas at once.
It's also increasingly the norm, not the exception. Formal mentoring has moved from a nice-to-have to close to standard practice among large employers over the past decade, tracking the same direction as the promotion and retention data below:
Employee development
- Knowledge transfer: Mentoring moves institutional knowledge from experienced employees to newer or less experienced staff before it walks out the door with a retiring or departing mentor.
- Skill development: Regular interaction with a mentor builds leadership, communication and problem-solving skills that are hard to teach in a workshop.
- Career pathing: Mentors help mentees set realistic goals and see a credible path to them inside the organisation, rather than assuming they need to leave to progress.
Engagement and retention
- Employees with a mentor report noticeably higher job satisfaction than those without one. CNBC and SurveyMonkey's 2019 Workplace Happiness Survey of nearly 8,000 US workers found that 91% of employees with a mentor were satisfied with their job, including 57% who were "very satisfied", well above the levels reported by workers without a mentor.
- Mentoring is also linked to lower voluntary turnover risk, not just higher satisfaction. In that same CNBC/SurveyMonkey survey, more than 4 in 10 workers without a mentor said they'd considered quitting their job in the past three months, compared with just 25% of those who had one, a pattern consistent with people being less likely to leave an employer that's visibly investing in them.
- A well-known set of findings from a Sun Microsystems study of roughly 1,000 employees, reported by Fortune and cited in Forbes, found that employees who were mentored were promoted five times more often than those who weren't, and mentors themselves were six times more likely to be promoted. Both mentors and mentees were also around 20% more likely to receive a pay rise than non-participants. It's an older study, but it's one of the most-cited data points in the mentoring literature because the effect size was so large, and the CNBC/SurveyMonkey research over a decade later found a similar direction of effect on satisfaction and retention, even though it didn't measure promotion rates directly.
Culture and inclusion
- Mentoring builds cross-team relationships that wouldn't otherwise form, improving collaboration and knowledge sharing.
- Structured programs can widen access to development and sponsorship for employees who wouldn't otherwise have an informal mentor in their network, which is one reason mentoring shows up repeatedly in DEI strategy.
Leadership pipeline
- Mentoring is one of the more reliable ways to identify and develop future leaders before a succession gap becomes urgent.
- Mentors sharpen their own coaching and communication skills in the process, so the benefit isn't one-directional.
Real example: the Australasian Corrosion Association ran a four-month mentoring pilot with Brancher connecting early-career professionals with senior experts through structured matching. The result was 100% match satisfaction, 100% of participants saying they'd recommend the program, and 42% of mentees expecting a promotion off the back of it. It's a useful illustration of what a well-structured, time-bound pilot can achieve without requiring a full enterprise rollout on day one. Read the full ACA case study.
For a broader look at the evidence base, see our full roundup of mentoring statistics and why organisations need mentoring.
What Are the Different Types of Mentoring?
There's no single model of workplace mentoring. Different formats suit different goals, so it's worth matching the format to the outcome you're after rather than defaulting to the traditional one-on-one model.
| Type | How it works | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional one-on-one | A senior employee is paired with a junior mentee for ongoing, tailored guidance | Deep, individual career development |
| Peer mentoring | Colleagues at similar levels support each other's growth | Mutual learning, camaraderie, early-career cohorts |
| Group mentoring | One mentor guides several mentees at once | Reaching more people efficiently, shared learning |
| Reverse mentoring | A junior employee mentors a senior one, often on technology or emerging trends | Keeping senior leaders current, generational knowledge exchange |
| Formal programs | Structured, company-run, with defined goals and a matching process | Measurable, organisation-wide outcomes |
| Informal mentoring | Develops naturally, without a formal structure | Flexibility, organic relationships |
Traditionally, mentors were senior figures by default. That's shifted, particularly with the rise of reverse mentoring and organisations deliberately opening the mentor role up to solve diversity and inclusion gaps, not just seniority gaps.

Before mentoring software existed, employees typically found a mentor by asking a friend or family contact, networking informally, or going through a third-party mentoring service. With a platform like Brancher in place, a program administrator can choose how matching happens:
- Admin-driven: administrators match participants based on recommendations from a science-based matching algorithm.
- User-driven: participants choose their own mentor from a shortlist the algorithm recommends.
- Hybrid: participants get a window to self-match, after which the administrator steps in to make sure everyone is paired by a set date.
Brancher is a pioneering global mentoring software that matches on personality and values alongside skills and goals, which are strong predictors of mentoring success. No matching approach guarantees a perfect pair every time, but Brancher's programs consistently see matching satisfaction above 98%.
What Features Should I Look For in a Mentoring Software?
Quick answer: At minimum, look for a genuine matching methodology (not just manual pairing with a database attached), an admin dashboard with real-time reporting, built-in engagement tools like reminders and conversation prompts, calendar integrations, and a plan structure that scales from a small pilot to an organisation-wide rollout without forcing you to switch platforms.
| Feature area | What to check for | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Matching methodology | Does it match on goals and skills only, or also on personality, values and availability? | Better-fitted pairs are more likely to stay engaged and complete the program |
| Admin dashboard and reporting | Real-time visibility into pair health, engagement and outcomes, not just a participant list | Lets you catch a disengaged pair early instead of finding out at the program review |
| Engagement tools | Session reminders, structured conversation guides, goal tracking | Keeps pairs on track without an administrator manually chasing every relationship |
| Integrations | Calendar sync (Outlook, Google Calendar), SSO for enterprise rollouts | Reduces friction for participants and IT teams alike |
| Accessibility | WCAG conformance, screen reader support, keyboard navigation | Non-negotiable for government, education and public-facing programs, and good practice everywhere else |
| Scalability and plan structure | Can you start with a small pilot and grow into an enterprise rollout on the same platform? | Avoids a costly platform migration once a pilot proves out |
Brancher, for example, offers a self-service Core plan for smaller programs and pilots, and an Enterprise plan that adds a dedicated support manager, a fully customisable matching algorithm, Outlook and Teams integration, and the ability to run multiple programs at once. Add-ons like Ava AI, a built-in AI career coach, extend support to mentors and mentees between sessions without adding to an administrator's workload.
This is a deliberately short overview. For a full, feature-by-feature breakdown, see our dedicated guides on key features to look for in mentoring software and mentoring software features, or explore Brancher's mentoring software directly.
Are You Ready to Start a Mentoring Program at Your Organisation?
Starting a program is more structured than it looks from the outside. These are the steps most organisations move through:
- Conduct internal research. Check whether an informal or previous mentoring effort already exists that you can build on.
- Survey employees. Find out who wants to participate as a mentor or mentee. Don't be discouraged if mentor volunteers are thin at first; this is common and usually improves with clearer communication about what mentoring actually involves.
- Define business objectives. Identify the specific goals (retention, leadership pipeline, DEI, engagement) and the internal sponsors who'll back the program.
- Assess costs. Speak to a mentoring software provider about design best practice and get a quote before committing to a structure.
- Design the program structure. Set goals, participant numbers, duration, meeting frequency, matching method, mentor training and success measures.
- Gather supporting data. Use published mentoring statistics and, where possible, a small pilot's results to build the business case for leadership.
- Present the proposal. Take the plan to your executive sponsors with the evidence attached.
Manual, pen-and-paper matching is slow, doesn't scale, and is more prone to unconscious bias than an algorithm-assisted process. If you're building the case for software as part of this, our guide to matching mentors and mentees covers the manual-versus-software trade-offs in more detail, and our free mentoring program checklist walks through the launch steps above in more depth.
If you're still weighing up whether your organisation needs mentoring, or how to structure and measure a program, book a demo to see Brancher's mentoring software in action.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is mentoring in a workplace context?
Mentoring is a structured, trust-based relationship in which a more experienced person (the mentor) supports someone less experienced (the mentee) to grow, learn and navigate their career. It's not advice from a pedestal; it's shared lived experience, access to networks, and help thinking through problems differently. The strongest mentoring relationships develop both professional skills and personal confidence.
Why should my organisation invest in a mentoring program?
Mentoring is one of the more evidence-backed development tools available, and it's now close to standard practice among large employers: 98% of US Fortune 500 companies visibly offer a mentoring program as of MentorcliQ's 2024 research, up from 84% a few years prior. It improves engagement, retention and leadership readiness while strengthening culture and cross-team connection. It's a strategic investment, not a box-ticking exercise.
How is mentoring different from coaching or training?
Training teaches people what to do. Coaching helps someone perform better at a specific task or close a defined gap. Mentoring goes broader and longer-term: it connects knowledge with context. Mentors share lessons from real experience rather than a fixed framework, which helps mentees build judgement, not just skills.
Who benefits most from mentoring?
Most participants benefit, but the effect is often strongest for emerging leaders, new hires and employees from underrepresented groups who might not otherwise have an informal mentor in their network. Mentoring also benefits mentors themselves. Research first reported via Fortune's coverage of a Sun Microsystems study found mentors were six times more likely to be promoted than non-mentors, alongside the wider benefits of sharpened leadership and coaching skills.
How can my organisation start a mentoring program?
Start with purpose, not paperwork. Define why mentoring matters for your organisation, whether that's leadership development, retention or inclusion, then use mentoring software to match participants on goals, values and working style. Build structure around it: mentor training, clear milestones and a way to measure impact. That's what separates a mentoring program that lasts from an ad-hoc pairing exercise that fizzles out after a few months.
Author Bio
Holly Brailsford is the Co-Founder and CEO of Brancher, and a registered organisational psychologist. She founded Brancher to bring an evidence-based, personality- and values-driven approach to workplace mentoring, and works with organisations across government, enterprise and the not-for-profit sector to design mentoring programs that deliver measurable outcomes.

